Thru some oversite on their part, I was able to slip thru the cracks ;) and present a review during the Emerging Technologies panel of my (and several other Surgeons) experience with the Ivivi, a pulsed electro-magnetic field devices for treating pain and swelling in Plastic Surgery. I'm told the presentation was well recieved. I believe that this device is poised to explode in popularity and indications in many areas of medicine. (NOTE:If you scroll down, you can read my previous post on this subject from January)
Some speakers I really enjoyed in particular:
-Pat Maxwell's & Jack Fisher's (both from Nashville,TN) lectures on patient safety, reoperative breast surgery, and combining augmentation & mastopexy procedures
- Peter Rubin & Dennis Hurwitz's (both from Pittsburgh,PA) course on body contouring in the massive weight loss patient
-Patrick Tonnard's (from Gent,Belgium) minimal access cranial suspension facelift (MACS)
- Osvaldo Saldanha's (from Brazil) concepts of liposuction/abdominoplasty to decrease complications
I also had the pleaseure of meetting, Dr. Linda Li and her husband, of Dr. 90210 fame while riding on one of the shuttles between the resort and the convention center. She is as nice and charming in person as she comes across on television.
In the next few weeks I think I'll outline some of the interesting topics and concepts from this meeting.
1. It's not worth cutting corners
2. The lunacy of the current FDA restrictions
The "compromise" imposed in the early 1990's by then FDA Commissioner, David Kessler, reserved implants for cancer patients and complex cosmetic cases. These were exactly the WRONG patients to choose if you were worried about device safety and post-operative complication rates as their expected reoperation rates are signifigantly higher then primary breast augmentation patients.
The FDA is still currently sitting on the 2005 advisory panel endorsements for Inamed & Mentor.
The second partial face transplant has now been successfully performed in China. This patient suffered a mauling injury by a bear apparently. As opposed to the first case report of this (see previous blog entries), there has been little fanfare or media coverage as yet. No outlining of the protocols of the institution performing the procedure have been released as far as I know. Those details of protocols (for selection, surgery, rehab, & immunosuppression) are the deal-breaker for these procedures. If China's past with hand transplants is any lesson, there may be problems. Several of the Chinese hand-transplant patients have reportedly had their hands amputated when the state quit paying for the life-long required immunosuppressive medicines.
1991-1994 United Kingdom Independent Expert Advisory Group (IEAG) In April, 1992, the IEAG concluded that there was no evidence of an increased risk of connective tissue disease in patients who had undergone silicone gel breast implantation and that there was no scientific case for changing practice or policy in the UK in respect of breast implantation
1996 US Review US Institute of Medicine (IOM) Not "sufficient evidence for an association of silicone gel- or saline-filled breast implants with defined connective tissue disease".
1996 France Agence Nationale pour le Developpement de l'Evaluation Medicale (ANDEM) "Nous navons pas observÃ de connectivite ni dÂautre pathologie auto-immune susceptible d'tre directement ou indirectement induite par la presence d'un implant mammaire en particulier en gel de silicone..." (We did not observe connective tissue diseases to be directly or indirectly associated with (in particular) silicone gel breast implants) ANDEM report
2000 US Review request of the United States Federal Judiciary "no evidence of an association between...silicone-gel-filled breast implants specifically, and any of the individual CTDs, all definite CTDs combined, or other autoimmune or rheumatic conditions."
2001 Great Britain UK Independent Review Group "there is no evidence of an association with an abnormal immune response or typical or atypical connective tissue diseases or syndromes" UK-IRG report
2001 US Review for court appointed National Science Panel. The panel evaluated both established and undifferentiated connective tissue diseases and concluded that there was no evidence of an association between breast implants and these CTDs.
2001 Australia Retrospective cohort (458 vs other plastic surgery) For diseases that occurred after surgery, there was no difference between the two groups in the incidence in reporting of any CTD, systemic sclerosis, SLE, or rheumatoid arthritis.
2001 Sweden Retrospective cohort (2376 vs 3470 breast reduction) There was no identifiable cluster of symptoms indicative of a specific atypical CTD, nor was there a specific pattern of inflammatory rheumatic disorders or soft-tissue complaints among women with breast implants.
2003 (update) Spain STOA Report to the European Parliament Petitions Committee, 2000 Regarding new scientific evidence, the currently available information shows that there is not solid evidence linking SBI to severe diseases (such as breast cancer or connective tissue diseases). STOA report
2004 Danish Followu19 years19years (190 vs 186 breast reduction & 149 controls) Self-reported CTDs overall, including rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, SLE, Sjogren's disease, polymyositis, and dermatomyositis, were not found in excess among women with implants compared with either control group.
2004 Danish Followup (2761 vs breast reduction & general population)Found no differences between the implant and breast reduction surgery cohorts in the incidence of any CTD. No excess was observed either in for all definite CTDs combined, nor any of the individual CTDs whiched whicg included rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, SLE and Sjogren's syndrome. Interestingly, the occurrence of mild, moderate, and severe musculoskeletal symptoms was generally lower among women with implants compared with women with other cosmetic surgery and women in the general population.
Now Gail has expanded her resume to include founder of (true)Promise...Uplifted!! Rodeo Drive Plastic Surgery in Beverly Hills provides the famed city's most elegant of medical facilities, featuring state-of-the-art exam rooms, marble counter tops, bamboo floors, original Andy Warhol paintings, and leather chairs. As of March 31, 2007, (true)Promise...Uplifted!! will be available exclusively at Rodeo Drive Plastic Surgery California.
"We've sold (true)Promise...Uplifted!! exclusively on the net until now," explains Gail. "I was waiting to find the right retail outlet and what could be better than to launch the product on the world's most glamorous boulevard? Rodeo Drive is known as the capitol of fashion, style and beauty and Dr. Krieger is one of Beverly Hill's most respected plastic surgeons. He offers the state of the art plastic surgery procedures and I feel (true)Promise...Uplifted!! is a great compliment to his work."
Question & Answer
How does Pro-Niacin™ assist in improving atopic skin?
Pro-Niacin™ has been clinically proven to strengthen the skin barrier through increasing the content of NAD within the skin cells and generating the growth and maturation of healthy skin cells from the inside-out. A stronger skin barrier improves atopic skin by providing better protection against environmental toxins, bacteria, etc. from aggravating the living skin cells beneath.
Can I layer the NIA 24™ Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 with the NIA 24™ Skin Strengthening Complex and if so, which product should I use first?
Yes, NIA 24™ products can be layered. Apply the Skin Strengthening Complex first, followed by the Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 to ensure that the sunscreen benefits are not diluted. Allow several minutes for the SPF 30 to be absorbed prior to make-up application.
By layering the NIA 24™ Skin Strengthening Complex along with the NIA 24™ Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30, will I be getting too much Pro-Niacin™, the active ingredient?
No. The extensive clinical and safety testing conducted on the Pro-Niacin™ molecule and NIA 24™ products have shown no unexpected side effects or reactions. Instead, clinical studies have shown dramatic improvements in skin health with use of the NIA 24™ products.
Can I use an additional moisturizer with the NIA 24™ products? If, so which should I use first?
Yes. While the Skin Strengthening Complex is an excellent moisturizer, some individuals may require more intensive moisturization. Apply the Skin Strengthening Complex first to ensure maximum efficacy of the Pro-Niacin™ molecule, then follow with your desired moisturizer.
Are NIA 24™ products compatible with most foundations?
Yes. Apply the Skin Strengthening Complex and/or Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 first and allow several minutes for the products to absorb prior to make-up application.
Can I use the NIA 24™ products for other areas of the body?
Yes. NIA 24™ products are ideal for use on areas of the face, neck, chest and hands.
Can the NIA 24™ products be used around the eye (orbital) area?
Yes. Application of the Skin Strengthening Complex and Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 can be extended to the orbital bone. However, as with all products, avoid eye contact.
Which NIA 24™ products can I use if I have dry skin?
All NIA 24™ Skin Therapy products can be used with dry skin. In fact, the Physical Cleansing Scrub is a physical scrub that can be less irritating than chemical exfoliants to dry skin that is red and irritated. Furthermore, the natural sunscreens in the Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 are also known to be less irritating than chemical sunscreens to dry skin.
Will the NIA 24™ products cause dryness?
The skin barrier's ability to retain moisture and resist damage can make the surface of the skin feel dry. To limit the effects of dryness, use a humectant or additional moisturizer to help hold water on top of the skin, applying the NIA 24™ products first.
Are the NIA 24™ products suitable for sensitive skin?
Yes. NIA 24™ products do not contain added fragrances, colors or dyes which can be potential irritants. The Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 is also oil and PABA-free and is a physical sunscreen which causes less irritation than chemical sunscreens to sensitive skin.
Can I use the NIA 24™ products if I have oily skin?
Yes. You may find that strengthening the skin barrier with the NIA 24™ products may help to control oil production. Each product also has additional individual benefits for oily skin. The Physical Cleansing Scrub helps remove dead skin cells that can clog pores and create blemishes. The Skin Strengthening Complex helps moisturize and nourish the skin, as even oily skin needs hydration or moisturization. The Sun Damage Prevention 100% Mineral Sunscreen SPF 30 is an oil-free formula that provides natural sunscreen protection from harmful UVA/UVB rays.
Will the NIA 24™ products clog pores and/or aggravate acne?
No. The NIA 24™ products were tested and found to be non-comedogenic, which as stated by the FDA, means that the products do not contain common pore-clogging ingredients that could lead to acne.